[whatwg] About Descendent Tags

On Fri, 1 May 2009, Christoph P?per wrote:
> Ian Hickson:
> > On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
> > > 
> > > The header element is not for the page header, it is for grouping section
> > > headings, and the tag name chosen for this element is misleading.
> > 
> > I've renamed the old <header> to <hgroup>.
> 
> Did you consider using 'h' instead?

I think that would be confusing for people who have heard of XHTML2's <h> 
(since it is quite different; HTML5's <h1> is the better match there). 
Normally that wouldn't be a great concern, but this is one feature of 
XHTML2 that has received a lot of attention from early adopters, and so 
confusion on this front could set the wrong trajectory for a long time to 
come. That is, after all, why we renamed the elements in the first place. :-)

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 14:21:35 UTC