- From: Adrian Sutton <adrian.sutton@ephox.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 12:42:25 +0100
On 01/05/2009 12:27, "Bruce Lawson" <brucel at opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 01 May 2009 12:22:32 +0100, Adrian Sutton > <adrian.sutton at ephox.com> wrote: > Off topic, I know - but couldn't a VBA macro hook into word and actually > make an "export as semantic html" option that exported the heading levels > as h1..h6, honoured bold, italics, links, bullets and numbers as ul and > ol, and just ignored all colours, font changes etc. So there is nothing to > clean up? Yes, but you'd have to get users to install the macro and get around virus checkers etc. Then you'd have to write a separate applescript version for Mac. I'm not sure how difficult all that would be - it's cheaper for us to just tweak and update the existing filtering code than it would be to go down this route now. It also wouldn't give the option to preserve the styles, but in a HTML compliant way which the filtering process does give (and pretty impressive accuracy in rendering given how little control HTML gives compared to Word's native model). EditLive! for example could include the styles as either an embedded stylesheet (thus preserving any custom styles from word as class names) or inline styles (thus making a very messy but compliant bit of HTML but useful if you're only editing a fragment). For the record, OpenOffice and it's variants tend to create pretty good HTML out of the box and don't need this kind of filtering at all. Excel is even surprisingly good but does add some proprietary attributes. Regards, Adrian Sutton. ______________________ Adrian Sutton, CTO UK: +44 1 753 27 2229 US: +1 (650) 292 9659 x717 Ephox <http://www.ephox.com/> Ephox Blogs <http://planet.ephox.com/>, Personal Blog <http://www.symphonious.net/>
Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 04:42:25 UTC