- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:31:01 +0100
Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> I wasn't talking of "browser implementations of feeds", but feed >> readers in general. > > Well yes, and a subset of those is browser based. Besides that, most > feed readers handle HTML. Do you think they should have two separate URL > parsing functions? Yes, absolutely. >>>> Don't leak out workarounds into areas where they aren't needed. >>> I'm not convinced that having two ways of handling essentially the >>> same thing is good. >> >> It's unavoidable, as the relaxed syntax doesn't work in many cases, >> for instance, when whitespace acts as a delimiter. > > Obviously you would first split on whitepace and then parse the URLs. > You can still use the same generic URL handling. In which case IRI handling should be totally sufficient. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 23 March 2009 03:31:01 UTC