- From: Dmitry Titov <dimich@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:34:07 -0700
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Drew Wilson <atwilson at google.com> wrote: > One alternative I'd like to propose is to remove access to localStorage for > dedicated workers, and give SharedWorkers access to localStorage, but have > that storage be partitioned by the worker name (i.e. the worker can access > it, but it's not shared with web pages or any other workers and so you don't > have any synchronicity issues). > This may be interesting. It allows to keep single API for localStorage. Most of the usage is probably going to happen inside such a worker - in other words, sharing the info with other pages of the same origin may not be needed, and there is always async communication when a live page wants to share data with a shared worker. Dmitry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090320/b5c8165c/attachment.htm>
Received on Friday, 20 March 2009 15:34:07 UTC