- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:53:05 +0100
The MAP element should be transparent. If it contains only AREA elements, it is invisible and it can belong to phrasing content; it is best placed alongside the IMG element that uses it; even the example <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-canvas-elem ent.html#the-map-element> provided is invalid <http://validator.nu/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.2a.pl%2F%7Ene01026%2Fimagemap.htm > ; it is an undocumented deviation from version 4 <http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/sgml/dtd.html#special> (content model deviations are undocumented). AREA elements should not belong to any category; they can appear only as immediate children of the MAP element (otherwise they are ignored per HTML4 so we can safely make them invalid). If it contains anything else, it must contain flow content for legacy reasons; therefore, it must belong to flow content. (I am aware of the fact that AREA elements are slightly deprecated.) Editorial: The title of 4.8.11 <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-canvas-elem ent.html> The canvas element - HTML 5 should be changed to something more appropriate - the page displays also subsection 4.8.12. Cheers, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090320/c641e8d4/attachment.htm>
Received on Friday, 20 March 2009 14:53:05 UTC