- From: Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:59:02 +0200
Tom Duhamel wrote: > that the use of non Gregorian is to be supported, I would go with the later > solution (allow non Gregorian as the content only, and have the datetime > attribute always defined as a Gregorian date), since that would not put much How about specifying that the content of <time> element will be parsed for the date only if 'datetime' attribute is empty. In addition, the spec should explicitly say that if the content is time in any other calendar system but Proleptic Gregorian calendar then the datetime MUST contain equivalent time in standard format (whatever the spec for 'datetime' will be). -- Mikko -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 254 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090316/ff5928a4/attachment.pgp>
Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 06:59:02 UTC