- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:42:06 +0200
Ian Hickson wrote: >> If this was a totally new syntax, I would agree. >> >> But as something based on ISO8601 (and thereby also RFC 3339) it appears >> to be a bad idea to make it less compatible just for that reason. > > We've seriously simplified the ISO-8601 syntax in many more ways than just > this. This was a conscious design decision. Yes, the same decision was made for RFC 3339 (and the similar W3C Note). I was recommending to stay closer to those, not to ISO8601. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 21:42:06 UTC