[whatwg] ApplicationCache spec questions

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, pamela fox wrote:
> 
> I was looking through the ApplicationCache API description (e.g. 
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#handler-appcache-onnoupdate) 
> and am trying to figure out, as a web developer, what my code might look 
> like for using window.applicationCache. The description of the events in 
> the ApplicationCache API isn't very specific, and it takes a while to 
> sort through the former section to see when the browser fires each event 
> (particularly for events like "progress" which is a common word in the 
> spec). It might be helpful to link back to that section when describing 
> the events, or to duplicate the "UI should show to the user".. 
> descriptions.

I've tried to add some explanatory text:

   http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#offline

How is it?


> The following code shows what I think would be the messages to show to
> a user for each situation.
> 
> var appCache = window.applicationCache;
> if (appCache.status == ApplicationCache.UNCACHED) {
>   alert("Not cached yet");
> }
> 
> appCache.checking = function() {
>   alert("Checking for updates");
> }
> appCache.onprogress= function() {
>   alert("Downloading new resources");
> }
> appCache.ondownloading = function() {
>   alert("Downloading the new manifest");
> }
> appCache.onupdateready = function() {
>    alert("There's a new version of the app available. Reload to see it.");
> }
> appCache.onnoupdate = function() {
>   alert("No updates necessary. Carry on.");
> }
> appCache.oncached = function() {
>   alert("Cached now! You can use this offline.");
> }
> appCache.onobsolete = function() {
>   alert("The app is no longer available offline. Sorry, we decided not
> to enable that feature anymore");
> }
> appCache.onerror = function() {
>   alert("Ruh oh, there was an error trying to cache this app for
> offline use. Our bad!");
> }
> 
> Do those alerts seem like a fair description?

Yup, that's exactly right.


> Also - one little thing- onnoupdate is a hard function name to parse, 
> from an English perspective. It took me a while to separate it into 
> on-no-update.

Yeah... not sure what to do about this really. Oh well.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Monday, 29 June 2009 02:59:01 UTC