- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:46:19 +0300
And it seems like IE scrolls first and then dispatches hashchange events. On 6/25/09 11:44 AM, Olli Pettay wrote: > Hi all, > > currently "6.11.9 History traversal" doesn't seem to handle > nested hashchange events too well. > If there is a fragment id change to A, hashchange is dispatched, then > if the listener changes the fragment to B, there is a new hashchange and > after that the page will scroll to B. But the fragment change to A > hasn't finished yet, so the page will then scroll to A. > > Either one should be able prevent the default action of hashchange > (scrolling), or hashchange should be dispatched after scrolling. > I think I'd prefer the latter. That would keep things simple and prevent > all sort of strange cases like the example above if preventDefault isn't > called. > > Also, what is the reason for "if the Document's current document > readiness is the string 'complete'" requirement? > I often click fragment links while the page is still loading, especially > when the page is large or slow loading. Why shouldn't the > page get notified that it has scrolled to some new location because of > fragment id change. > > > > -Olli >
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 03:46:19 UTC