- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:23:07 -0700
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Simon Pieters<simonp at opera.com> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:27:18 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM, <jjcogliati-whatwg at yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> I read section 4.8.7 The video element and I have some questions: >>> 1. ?What happens if the user agent supports the video tag but does not >>> support the particular video codec that the video file has? ?Should it >>> display the fallback content in that case, and if so, can a video tag be put >>> inside another video tag? >> >> If the particular codec is not supported, it displays the fallback >> content instead. > > No. If the particular codec is not supported then you get a blank box. Hmm.. is that good? What if you want to use an <object> (to use flash or java) or a <img> as fallback? / Jonas
Received on Sunday, 14 June 2009 23:23:07 UTC