- From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:41:31 -0400
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Chris DiBona<cdibona at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm okay with Flak, and I really do believe in shipping > free/unemcumbered software (see our lgpl discussion earlier). That > said, I dislike when I'm accused of being reprehensible by another > browser vendor. This line of argument is incorrect in a couple of ways. Firstly, it is an ad hominem argument, stating that my employer makes my statement somehow unacceptable. Secondly, I didn't say anything about /you/. I wrote about the practice of shipping encumbered software and calling it "open". > It seems unfairly nasty to me. What is unfair or nasty about it? > > That said, I feel like I've been threadjacking this list for too long > now, and for that I apologize, it seems like we're gong down a codec > rathole that may or may not have any relevance for the spec in the > end. Actually, the spec used to mention Ogg specifically. -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
Received on Sunday, 7 June 2009 18:41:31 UTC