- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils-dagsson-moskopp@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:29:38 +0200
Am Montag, den 08.06.2009, 09:24 +0900 schrieb Chris DiBona: > > The incredibly sucky outcome is that Chrome ships patent-encumbered > > "open web" features, just like Apple. That is reprehensible. > > Reprehensible? Mozilla (and all the rest) supports those same "open > web" features through its plugin architecture. Why don't you make a > stand and shut down compatibility with plugins from flash, quicktime > and others? How long would Firefox last in the market if it were > incompatible with those? Honestly. Please, stay calm. Flash is also evil[tm] (read: detrimental to accessibility and compatibility) too and I think you know that. Also, the status quo (various proprietary plugins) says nothing about how something should be (accessible, interoperable standards); this is called the is-ought-problem, please read up on it. Cheers, -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Received on Sunday, 7 June 2009 17:29:38 UTC