- From: David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 18:59:38 +0100
2009/6/7 Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar at googlemail.com>: > How is it incredible? Who has looked at the submarine patents? They by > definition are unpublished! Yes, certainly, published patents are well > researched, but this is not the objection that anyone has made to it. It is not credible to claim that any other codec whatsoever does not have the same problems - and paying Thomson or the MPEG-LA does *not* protect one from submarine claims from others, as Microsoft found out to its cost with MP3 - nor is it credible to claim that Ogg formats have more such problems. - d.
Received on Sunday, 7 June 2009 10:59:38 UTC