W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2009

[whatwg] Google's use of FFmpeg in Chromium and Chrome Was: Re: MPEG-1 subset proposal for HTML5 video codec

From: Chris DiBona <cdibona@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:20:15 +0800
Message-ID: <7d9492d90906021720yddb186eq504ba2c29d67f210@mail.gmail.com>
Looping in Danny (in transit)

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Geoffrey Sneddon
<foolistbar at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2 Jun 2009, at 02:58, Chris DiBona wrote:
>
>> One participant quoted one of the examples from the LGPL 2.1, which
>> says "For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free
>> redistribution of the Library by all those who receive copies directly
>> or indirectly through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it
>> and this License would be to refrain entirely from distribution of the
>> Library."
>
> I'm still unclear as to how this does not apply to Chrome's case. If I get a
> copy of Chrome, you are bound (by the LGPL) to provide me with a copy of the
> source ffmpeg, and I must be able to redistribute that in either binary or
> source form. I would, however, get in trouble for not having paid patent
> fees for doing so. Hence, as that example concludes, you cannot distribute
> ffmpeg whatsoever.
>
>
> --
> Geoffrey Sneddon
> <http://gsnedders.com/>
>
>



-- 
Open Source Programs Manager, Google Inc.
Google's Open Source program can be found at http://code.google.com
Personal Weblog: http://dibona.com
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 17:20:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:12 UTC