W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2009

[whatwg] Google's use of FFmpeg in Chromium and Chrome

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:19:30 +0200
Message-ID: <18980.46690.413772.64470@opera.com>
Also sprach Chris DiBona:

 > To be clear, there are two situations here:
 > Situation 1:
 > (a) Party A gives Party B a library licensed under the LGPL 2.1 along
 > with a patent license which says only Party B has the right to use it
 > (b) Party B wants to distribute the library to others
 > That's the situation the example in the LGPL 2.1 text is talking about
 > and would likely be a violation.
 > Situation 2:
 > (a) Party A gives Party B a library licensed under the LGPL 2.1
 > (b) Party B gets a patent license from Party C
 > (c) Party B then distribute the library under the LGPL 2.1
 > This situation is *not* prohibited by the LGPL 2.1 (see the LGPL 3.0
 > for a license that does deal with this situation).  Under the LGPL
 > 2.1, the fact that Party B may have a patent license with an unrelated
 > third-party is irrelevant as long as it doesn't prevent Party B from
 > granting people the rights LGPL 2.1 requires they grant them (namely,
 > only those rights it in fact received from Party A).

Thanks for your willingness to discuss these matters.

So, to be clear, you're saying that situation 2 applies in your case?

              H?kon Wium Lie                          CTO ??e??
howcome at opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 22:19:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:12 UTC