W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2009

[whatwg] Dates BCE

From: Sam Kuper <sam.kuper@uclmail.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:12:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4126b3450907300912m266ef5a4yd3af938c7d9cbe19@mail.gmail.com>
2009/7/30 Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com>

> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Sam Kuper<sam.kuper at uclmail.net> wrote:
> > Not for BCE; I'm not working on that period at the moment, but excepting
> > that, here are a couple of good examples with ranges:
> > http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/darwinletters/calendar/entry-10762.html
> > http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/darwinletters/calendar/entry-295.html
> > http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/darwinletters/calendar/entry-6611f.html
> > Now, either there should be markup available for ranges, or it should at
> > least be possible to specify components of a date independently of each
> > other, and to imply (at least for humans) a "range" spanning these
> different
> > date elements as appropriate.
>
> Now, here's the million-dollar question: Why do you need <time> or
> something like it for these dates?  You seem to have them marked up
> quite fine as it is.
>

1) Machine readability.
2) Consistency across websites that mark up dates.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090730/164aff55/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 30 July 2009 09:12:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:14 UTC