W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2009

[whatwg] Installed Apps

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:38:39 -0700
Message-ID: <D23573A2-530F-490D-9225-74BA1E753465@apple.com>

On Jul 27, 2009, at 8:23 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Maciej Stachowiak<mjs at apple.com>  
> wrote:
>> Persistent workers are even more of a security risk, since they are  
>> supposed
>> to persist even after the browser has been restarted, or after the  
>> system
>> has been rebooted. Persistent workers should be renamed to "BotNet
>> Construction Kit".
> Surely this proposal also would have the pages run even after the
> browser has been restarted, or the system rebooted?  It was suggested
> that ideally they'd continue running even when the browser has been
> shut down!

If that's the suggestion, then they are just as dangerous as  
persistent workers, or maybe more. But I think the point is, I don't  
think it's generally accepted that persistent workers are safe, so  
there's no argument by analogy that persistent background pages would  
be safe.

Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:38:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:14 UTC