- From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:59:29 -0700
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > > If it's only for debugging purposes, maybe a cleaner way to define it is > > to simply be the last event fired on a given WebSocket? > > I don't really understand what problem we would be trying to solve by > changing that. I was just suggesting that perhaps the model could be simplified and that this might make it less confusing to web and UA developers. I haven't studied this issue in detail though, so if you think it's a silly idea, there's a good chance it is. As for the rest of your changes, I think they should work well. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090728/9546e3d2/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 16:59:29 UTC