- From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:56:49 -0700
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 26, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > > Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > I would also caution that, by their nature, standards projects are not > > quite the same thing as software projects. While the way HTML5 has been > > run is much more in the spirit of open source than many past Web > > standards, I'm not sure all the lessons can be applied blindly. > > > I don't think that the lessons should be applied blindly... I think they > should be applied selectively and with great care. We don't want to > destabilize the way HTML5 is currently being developed - but we do want > to improve the process for giving feedback, get more people making > meaningful contributions, make the process of contributing more > harmonious and hopefully accelerate the speed at which features can be > developed. These are all direct or implied goals in the Restructuring > HTML5 proposal[1]. > > > The lesson I would learn from open source is that finding people willing to > do useful work is much more important than tools or project > organization. While good projects strive to refine their process, my > experience is that people who start out by > asking project-wide tools or process changes to enable their contribution > rarely turn into valuable contributors. On the other hand, people who start > out by making substantive contributions within the existing process often > have excellent insights into how to improve the process and tools from > there. That's not to say this is universal - just what my experience has > been in ~14 years of open source development on various projects. > I've worked on a couple open source projects and watched many others from the sidelines, and I can say that this definitely mirrors my experiences as well. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090726/c36e4b43/attachment.htm>
Received on Sunday, 26 July 2009 21:56:49 UTC