- From: Benjamin M. Schwartz <bmschwar@fas.harvard.edu>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:39:52 -0400
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Justin Lebar wrote: >>>> That being said, inline spec comments sound interesting. >>> I'm not quite sure what the UI would look like, but if anyone has any >>> ideas, feel free to e-mail me directly and we can figure something >>> out. (This would be exceedingly useful once we're in last call in a >>> few months.) >> Other people have probably pointed this out, but the hg book has inline >> comments. http://hgbook.red-bean.com/read/preface.html > > That's an interesting approach, but I don't think it would work well with > the HTML5 spec -- we probably need a mechanism that feeds into the current > system (i.e. sends an e-mail) rather than annotating the document itself, > and the document is in too much flux to track where the annotations go That sounds to me like a good reason to declare a freeze at last call, and release an immutable "beta 1" on which comments can be made. Then close the comment period on beta 1, and (potentially) release a beta 2, etc. --Ben -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090724/972c137d/attachment.pgp>
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 21:39:52 UTC