- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:19:04 +0200
Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 22.07.2009, 10:38 +0000 schrieb ppj: >> The Goal: Links w/o anchors. >> The Strategy: Two stage process. >> 1) get an extra 'search' attribute on to the <a> tag in HTML so that we >> have: >> e.g. <a href='...' search='...'>link text</a> >> 2) If there's take-up, then later on push for adding a date-time of creation attribute to <a>. This will add link history to the internet. >> The way (1) works is someone sticks the basic href to a page in the href >> attribute, and then sticks the text they want to link to in the search >> attr. The browser fetches the page, and as a secondary action (at user >> option) searches for the >> text. The simple option is that it just searches for the plain string, >> maybe later it can do all the fancy approximate match stuff that I put >> in the XPunt prototype in '06/07. >> Since we know those search strings don't have to be very long to find >> the unique location, it shouldn't burden the document text very much. > > An additional element seems very hackish; this likely is something > better brought up in the context of an URI working group. I would also > recommend talking to implementors directly. Fragment identifiers depend on the MIME type, thus it's in scope for the HTML WG (which is in charge of text/html and application/xhtml+xml). ...but do consider existing work in this area, such as XPointer... BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 03:19:04 UTC