- From: Peter Kasting <pkasting@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:09:11 -0700
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp < nils-dagsson-moskopp at dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote: > What's with alphanumeric notation ? I think of 555-WHATWG as a possibly > valid telephone "number". It might be good to have an RFC on that. Or > maybe ITU has publicly available documents on numbering plans ? > Yeah, I thought of that kind of thing (but didn't mention it). If we don't want to disallow users from doing things like this, there probably isn't a simple enough validation algorithm we can use. It might be nice to mention in the spec why type=tel is not validated the way email and url are, at that point. PK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090720/2e9b1db9/attachment.htm>
Received on Monday, 20 July 2009 13:09:11 UTC