- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils-dagsson-moskopp@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:06:32 +0200
Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 05:46 +0100 schrieb David Wilson: > It's easy to see how some naively implemented JS audio widget could > fetch 200mb over an expensive 3G connection, simply by navigating to > some site in a background tab (say, by creating an array of elements > to represent their playlist - something I'd have thought was perfectly > valid behaviour). I second that motion, not only as owner of a smartphone, but also as someone with webspace that has a volume cap. Automagic audio element buffering could deter web authors from dynamically putting more than one element on a page, thus reserving javascript playlist widgets to those who can afford more bandwith on an order of magnitude (!). I believe the burden of writing another line should solely be on those who want autobuffering, to prevent unneccessary bandwith consumption. Cheers -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Received on Sunday, 19 July 2009 22:06:32 UTC