- From: Mike Shaver <mike.shaver@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:42:14 -0400
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Peter Kasting<pkasting at google.com> wrote: > It makes sense if you think about it -- whether YouTube sends videos encoded > as H.264 is irrelevant to what the _baseline_ codec for <video> needs to be, > it is only relevant as additional info for vendors deciding whether to > support H.264. Yes, I concur -- I couldn't think of any reason for that to be relevant to the discussion of baseline codecs at first, so I tried to make it fit (and asked questions about the details of it). I will patiently await the details. :-) Mike
Received on Tuesday, 14 July 2009 11:42:14 UTC