- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:35:54 -0500
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Jonas Sicking<jonas at sicking.cc> wrote: > This way even incremental rendering of the fallback contents would > work fine. The only case that's weird is markup like: > > <video> > ?lots and lots of fallback here > ?<source src="..."> > </video> > > There is a risk that content would be displayed, and then switch to > displaying video. This doesn't seem like a big problem as it seems > more likely that people will put the <source> first. And if someone > doesn't the effects aren't very bad. That's against spec anyway (<source> elements, if present, should be the first children of <video>, and are then followed by fallback content if present), so it's not a big deal if it displays badly.
Received on Monday, 13 July 2009 14:35:54 UTC