- From: Joseph Pecoraro <joepeck02@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:51:23 -0400
> We could make Storage into an EventTarget and also fire events on > there, > sure. As Jeremy said, this is something that might best be done in the > next version; we're still trying to get the current features > implemented > in a stable and consistent fashion as it is. Sounds great. Although wouldn't now be the best time to introduce something new? Its not a breaking change (theoretically), its an additional feature. Its my understanding that most of Web Storage is undergoing changes (B-trees and SQL orthogonally), but the Storage interface is not going to change much? Is that because of current browser support? > In general, though, I don't think it's critical, since you can > easily work > around it by checking which was changed based on the event data Fair enough. =) > (I agree that your proposal would have made more sense. I'm sorry my > learning experiences have such a detrimental effect on the Web! :-) ) We're all learning. =P > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E ) > \._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _ > \ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'-- > (,_..'`-.;.' - Joe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090713/1d29f64e/attachment.htm>
Received on Monday, 13 July 2009 07:51:23 UTC