- From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:43:03 -0700
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:37 AM, SA Alfonso Baqueiro <abaqueiro at gmail.com>wrote: > In the lack of agreement. > > Instead of removing the video section from the spec, we should be > DEMOCRATIC, the codec that more vendors support should get in the spec, like > the goverments are elected. > > In this case Ogg Theora will be suported by 3 vendors except Safari, so 3 > vs 1, it should get in. The case of H.264 has no majority to be supported. > > The whatwg has power, if the standard says something the vendors will have > to implement it to stay on the edge > they have no reason to not do it, more when the the codec of ogg is open > and the source code implementation is out there. > > OPEN IS KING. > This has been discussed to death. Your exact point has already been made and responded to several times. Please read the archives. J -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090707/f6fb9c17/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 09:43:03 UTC