- From: Adam Shannon <ashannon1000@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:01:52 -0500
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org>wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Adam Shannon <ashannon1000 at gmail.com>wrote: > >> What about slower, public, or WIFI connections that can't support 5 people >> going to yahoo.com and having audio of interviews load? Yahoo would >> think that everyone would want to listen to at least the first ~15-30 >> seconds. >> > > What about them? I'm not sure what your point is. > There already low bandwidth would be crippled more than it already is. (By loading audio files. > > > I think we expect "new Audio" to be used for scripted playing of sounds, > not to create in-page audio elements. > If that is the purpose for the <audio> element then it may be missing out, I would love support for in-page audio, it could be used for podcasts, radio, interviews, ect... > > > Rob > -- > "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; > the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are > healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his > own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah > 53:5-6] > -- - Adam Shannon ( http://ashannon.us ) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090705/1a1002c9/attachment.htm>
Received on Sunday, 5 July 2009 18:01:52 UTC