- From: Markus Ernst <derernst@gmx.ch>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:07:07 +0200
Ian Hickson schrieb: > On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Andrew W. Hagen wrote: > >> Encouraging use of small print for legalese also encourages this: >> >> <h1> >> <a href="continue.html"> >> Welcome to the BigCo web site. Click to continue. >> </a> >> </h1> >> <small>By clicking above, you agree that BigCo can charge your >> credit card $10 per visit to the BigCo web site per page clicked.</small> > > Right, that's the case we do want to encourage. It's better than the > alternative, which would be: > > <style> > .s { font-size: smaller; } > </style> > <h1> > <a href="continue.html"> > Welcome to the BigCo web site. Click to continue. > </a> > </h1> > <span class=s>By clicking above, you agree that BigCo can charge your > credit card $10 per visit to the BigCo web site per page clicked.</span> > > ...because if they use <small>, you can configure your client to go out of > its way to highlight <small> text, whereas you have no way to know to > highlight any text based on its font size or class. Anyway that does not prevent the BigCos from using <span> or <p> or <div>, if they really want to style their fraudulent text the way it is hard to read. The more user agents will be set to display the <small> element big, the less this element will be used by those who are actually addressed by this encouragement. Instead of keeping a purely presentational category such as "small" as an HTML element, would it not be more efficient to use some kind of <legal> element? User agents then could be configured to ignore small text sizes or badly visible colors on <legal> elements. Also, other ways to bar people from reading legal text, such as setting it in uppercase characters, could be handled - which does not seem appropriate for a <small> element. And countries willing to protect their people from fraud could establish a law that any text on a website is only legally binding when it is marked up with the <legal> element. -- Markus
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 05:07:07 UTC