W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2009

[whatwg] Codecs for <audio> and <video>

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:41:27 +0200
Message-ID: <op.uwdujdda64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook.local>
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:39:05 +0200, Peter Kasting <pkasting at google.com>  
> There is no other reason to put a codec in the spec -- the primary  
> reason to spec a behavior (to document vendor consensus) does not  
> apply.  "Some
> vendors agreed, and some objected violently" is not "consensus".

The "vendor consensus" line of argument seems like a very dangerous  
slippery slope. It would mean that whenever a vendor refuses to implement  
something it has to be taken out of the specification. I.e. giving a  
single vendor veto power over the documentation of the Web Platform. Not  
good at all in my opinion.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 02:41:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:13 UTC