- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:33:50 +0100
On 17/1/09 19:27, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Shelley Powers > <shelleyp at burningbird.net> wrote: >> The debate about RDFa highlights a disconnect in the decision making related >> to HTML5. > > Perhaps. Or perhaps not. I am far from an apologist for Hixie, (nor > for that matter and I a strong advocate for RDF), but I offer the > following question and observation. > >> The purpose behind RDFa is to provide a way to embed complex information >> into a web document, in such a way that a machine can extract this >> information and combine it with other data extracted from other web pages. >> It is not a way to document private data, or data that is meant to be used >> by some JavaScript-based application. The sole purpose of the data is for >> external extraction and combination. > > So, I take it that it isn't essential that RDFa information be > included in the DOM? This is not rhetorical: I honestly don't know > the answer to this question. Good question. I for one expect RDFa to be accessible to Javascript. http://code.google.com/p/rdfquery/wiki/Introduction -> http://rdfquery.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/demos/markup/markup.html is a nice example of code that does something useful in this way. cheers, Dan -- http://danbri.org/
Received on Saturday, 17 January 2009 10:33:50 UTC