- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:31:13 +0200
On Jan 11, 2009, at 18:52, Calogero Alex Baldacchino wrote: > However, actually it's the same for RDFa attributes, because they're > not in the spec. From this point of view, introducing six new > attributes, or resorting to an older one is not very different, thus > (again) why RDFa and not eRDF? eRDF is very different in not relying on attributes whose qname contains the substring "xmlns". -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 12 January 2009 11:31:13 UTC