W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2009

[whatwg] Trying to work out the problems solved by RDFa

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:41:10 +0100
Message-ID: <4967A856.5010206@gmx.de>
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> *If* we want to support RDFa, why not add the attributes the way they are
>> already named???
> Because the issue is that we don't yet know if we want to support
> RDFa.  That's the whole point of this thread.  Nobody's given a useful
> problem statement yet, so we can't evaluate whether there's a problem
> we need to solve, or how we should solve it.

For the record: I disagree with that. I have the impression that no 
matter how many problems are presented, the answer is going to be: "not 
that stone -- fetch me another stone".

> Alex's suggestion, while officially against spec, has the benefit of
> allowing RDFa supporters to sort out their use cases through
> experience.  That's the back door into the spec, after all; you don't

If something that is against the spec is acceptable, then it's *much* 
easier to just use the already defined attributes. Better breaking the 
spec by using new attributes then abusing existing ones.

 > ...

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 9 January 2009 11:41:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:09 UTC