- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:24:19 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, dolphinling wrote:
>
> Back in 2004, I sent an email about mutually exclusive sections in
> forms, which was responded to as "a good idea, put on hold until WF3".
> <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2004-October/002285.html>
> <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2004-November/002532.html>
>
> I don't see this in the issues list or anywhere else on the site, and
> while the comments at the end of WF2 mention some related ideas to
> accomplish similar things, I don't see what I proposed.
>
> So I just want to make sure it hasn't been lost in the years of work
> that's gone on.
It's in the list of issues at the bottom of the spec, as:
XXX * dolphinling suggests having a way to mark certain parts of a
form as being dependent on another (mutually exclusive parts of
a form)
HTH,
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2009 04:24:19 UTC