- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:03:18 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Ric Hardacre wrote: > > from the web forms doc in the comment at the bottom: > > * have a way of marking the first option of a <select> as the default > but have it not satisfy a new required="" attribute on <select> so > that you can have selects that require a valid value. > > my proposed solution: [...] > > * A fairly common situation for web authors is to have two lists, where > the contents of the second depends on the value of the first. Is here > any way we could extend the current model to include this functionality? > > [...] On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, dolphinling wrote: > > [...] I think the solutions proposed here (not quoted above for brevity) are interesting. However, I think, as with my earlier e-mail today, we should probably wait until the current crop of forms features is more widely implemented before adding more features. Thus, I haven't actually added these features yet. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2009 04:03:18 UTC