[whatwg] Minor error in content‐type sniffing table

• From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
• Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 23:06:01 +0000
• Message-ID: <0ED82603-A4CF-4B64-9C0F-AD577BC56A92@googlemail.com>

On 2 Jan 2009, at 22:39, 111mth at gmail.com wrote:

> In section 2.7.4 of the specification, part of the table reads
> FF FF 00 00
> FE FF 00 00
> text/plain
> n/a
> UTF-16BE BOM
> FF FF 00 00
> FF FF 00 00
> text/plain
> n/a
> UTF-16LE BOM
> in the 1 January draft.
>
> Should this be
> FF FF 00 00
> FE FF 00 00
> text/plain
> n/a
> UTF-16BE BOM
> FF FF 00 00
> FF FE 00 00
> text/plain
> n/a
> UTF-16LE BOM
> ?

Yes.


--
Geoffrey Sneddon

Received on Friday, 2 January 2009 15:06:01 UTC