- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:48:21 +0100
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:54:00 +0100, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay at helsinki.fi> wrote: > currently > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/timers.html#printing > says that window.print() should prompt user to print the page, but that > "For instance, a kiosk browser could silently ignore any invocations of > the print() method." > > A print button in web pages is quite common, and if pressing that > doesn't give any feedback (and the web page can't even detect if it > should give some feedback of missing printing), the user experience > isn't quite optimal. > > So I think it *might* make sense to throw some error if printing isn't > supported. Or should browsers which don't support window.print() just > not have print() method in the window object? (problem is that I'd guess > everyone just expects .print() to be there) Throwing an error does not seem very compatible either. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 28 December 2009 04:48:21 UTC