- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:30:26 -0800
Some of us at Apple have discussed fullscreen APIs, and we think a user gesture requirement plus clear indication of what has happened is likely sufficient. As to the API itself: we tentatively think a good API would be to make a specific *element* go full screen, rather than the whole Web page. Some use cases for fullscreen will indeed want to transition the whole page, for example, let's say a Web-based editor wants to provide a distraction-free fullscreen mode like WriteRoom. However, it seems like many common use cases will benefit most from taking only part of the page full-screen, for example video or games, where it's common for the original content to only be a small box in the page. Now, content could just manually hide the parts of the page in response to an event. Or you could provide a special media type or pseudo-class to use CSS to hide the unwanted content. But taking an element rather than a page full-screen has two benefits: 1) It handles some very common use cases (including likely one of the *most* common, video) in a way that's much simpler for the content author. 2) The browser will have the option to animate the transition to fullscreen starting from the target element, in a clean way. If content has to make layout changes by hand to limit itself to the specific fullscreen target, then it's extremely difficult, perhaps impossible, for the browser to do a single smooth animated transition without any unwanted flickering or layout thrash. We don't have a specific API proposal to make right now, but I'll try to get the people working on this to put forward a concrete proposal soon. Regards, Maciej On Dec 17, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Robert O'Callahan > <robert at ocallahan.org> wrote: >> 2009/12/17 Ian Fette (????????) <ifette at google.com> >>> >>> I'm not convinced we actually need opt-in, though if we did have >>> opt-in it >>> should allow the user to persist that choice (don't ask me for >>> permission >>> each time i try to fullscreen a youtube video.) >> >> Sure. >> >>> >>> I would much rather go for user gesture + opt-out. e.g. you have >>> to cal >>> fullscreen() in response to a user gesture, you immediately get >>> fullscreened, >> >> It's really easy to get users to click on things. >> >>> >>> but maybe there's some dorky bar up top that stays around until >>> you click >>> "go away" or "never put up the dork bar again for this site". >> >> Maybe... > > Technically speaking this isn't something that needs to be > standardized. All we need is a standardized fullscreen() function > somewhere, and possibly standardized "fullscreenon"/"fullscreenoff" > events. Browsers are free to implement whatever UI they want after > that. > > / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2009 01:30:26 UTC