- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:28:35 +0100
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:24:37 +0100, Ian Fette (????????) <ifette at google.com> wrote: > Ok, I sense resistance to putting it in .name. What about .path, > undefined > in most cases except where there is an upload including files from > multiple > directories, in which case .path contains the path less any path > components > common to all 3 (sorry, it's early morning and I can't write well before > having coffee). > > e.g. > > input.files[0].name="1.jpg" > input.files[0].path="a/b" > input.files[1].name="2.jpg" > input.files[1].path="a/b" > input.files[2].name="3.jpg" > input.files[2].path="a/c" > > (Need to figure out the exact wording, as "a" is common to all 3 but if > you're uploading the entire directory "a", it may make sense to include > that > in the path -- but I don't feel quite as strongly about that -- > subfolders > are certainly more important IMO.) Note that extensions to File should be discussed on public-webapps at w3.org. At least, that's where they have been so far. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 11 December 2009 06:28:35 UTC