- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:47:34 +0100
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:33:06 +0100, Markus Ernst <derernst at gmx.ch> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren schrieb: >> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:13:52 +0100, Markus Ernst <derernst at gmx.ch> >> wrote: >>> I have no idea how to handle such inconsistent behaviour on the server >>> side (except adding extra code to flatten all uploaded directory >>> structures before handling). I assume that HTTP upload should be kept >>> simple, and more complex upload tasks should be handled with >>> specialized applications, such as RadUpload[1]. >>> >>> [1] http://www.radinks.com >> >> I don't think we want to rely on the availability of Java on the end >> user's platform (or the availability of any other plug-in for that >> matter). > > I did not mean including it into HTML5 or an UA. Just leaving > specialized upload tasks out of the standard, assuming that developers > will work with applications that they think are useful for their tasks > (and that rely on technologies they believe are avaliable at their > target audience). And I mean that if it is important to application developers we should make it available as a feature and not endorse some plug-in dependency. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 11 December 2009 00:47:34 UTC