- From: Yuzo Fujishima <yuzo@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:06:57 +0900
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (?~\??~V~G?U~O) wrote: >> protocol now accepts U+0020. Is it ok to use U+0020 only in /protocol/ ? >> (e.g. new WebSocket("ws://example.com/", " "); ) >> It seems space is optional after colon in field of handshake message, how >> can we distinguish U+0020 and U+0020 U+0020 ? > The space isn't optional (both the client and the server are required to > send it before the subprotocol name), it's just that the client will > handle a missing space gracefully. Maybe we should remove that "feature", > and require that the space be present, closing the connection otherwise? > I don't feel strongly either way. > Anyway, the point is that "WebSocket-Protocol: " is the empty string, and > "WebSocket-Protocol: ?" is a one-space protocol name. Hi, Ian, let me confirm one thing: Empty string is not allowed for subprotocol, is it? Yuzo > -- > Ian Hickson ? ? ? ? ? ? ? U+1047E ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?)\._.,--....,'``. ? ?fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ ? ? ? U+263A ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/, ? _.. \ ? _\ ?;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. ? `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > _______________________________________________ > hybi mailing list > hybi at ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 00:06:57 UTC