W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2009

[whatwg] "complete" DOM attribute (image elements)

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:35:03 -0700
Message-ID: <4A9B1AB7.7080609@mit.edu>
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Gavin Sharp wrote:
>> It appears this behavior was explicitly chosen in Mozilla, in bug 190561 
>> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190561). I think the 
>> arguments given in that bug might merit reconsideration; detection of 
>> image existence is currently possible by other means

How, exactly?

>> and I'm not sure 
>> how much weight "the Rhino Book" should have in influencing current DOM 
>> specs.

None whatsoever, in my opinion.

> My findings match yours. I have left the spec as is, for compatibility 
> with IE, and because it seems the most logical.

It seems like a privacy leak to me, in the case of cross-site images.

Received on Sunday, 30 August 2009 17:35:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:51 UTC