- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:03:38 -0400
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ian Hickson<ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > Sure. For example, the UA might want to display the list of resources to > the user. In such a UI, if the UI includes types, it would have to use the > type="" attribute's value as the type. That seems very speculative. Does any UA actually do anything like this, with <link>s or anything else? > I guess I don't understand what you're asking for the spec to do. Do you > want to drop the type="" attribute altogether? No, I just thought this particular requirement should be "should" instead of "must". Or should be dropped entirely, since it seems very vague to me and I'm not clear what real-world scenario it addresses. But it doesn't really matter and isn't worth spending time arguing over if you don't agree.
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2009 17:03:38 UTC