- From: Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:00:50 +0100
Hixie wrote: > Allowing elements to wrap both inlines and blocks is a huge can of > worms > which has caused all kinds of problems for <ins>, <del>, and <a>. I > really > don't want to start adding more elements to this list of complexity. Fair enough. But in that case, I think perhaps the spec could do with a bit of rewording for the <small> element. The current wording: > "Small print typically features disclaimers, caveats, legal > restrictions, or copyrights. Small print is also sometimes used for > attribution, or for satisfying licensing requirements." ...sounds like an *exact* fit for Remy's use case: > So I'm making a list of disclaimers for my site: > > <ol> > <li>You must agree to this term</li> > <li>And this term too</li> > <li>And don't break this term</li> > <li>And don't forget the milk</li> > </ol> > <p>By reading this, you're agreeing to xyz</p> Does anyone have any ideas on a rewording of the definition of the <small> element to make it clear that it is only intended for certain instances but not others? Alternatively, does anyone else think the <small> element should be capable of wrapping inline and block elements? (raises hand) -- Jeremy Keith a d a c t i o http://adactio.com/
Received on Monday, 24 August 2009 03:00:50 UTC