- From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:08:27 -0700
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Darin Fisher<darin at chromium.org> wrote: > > I agree. Moreover, since a shared worker identified by a given name > cannot > > be "navigated" elsewhere, the name isn't all that synonymous with other > > usages of names (e.g., window.open). At the very least, it would seem > > helpful to scope the name to the URL to avoid the name conflict issue. > > -Darin > > Technically, that can already be done by using the current the current > URL as the name. I don't quite understand. Are you suggesting that you can work around this by passing the same parameter twice when creating a shared worker? If so, that seems ugly...and a sign that it should be changed. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090818/95221dcc/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:08:27 UTC