- From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:30:05 -0700
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam at mcc.id.au> wrote: > Boris Zbarsky: > > Given the actual example code (and not its description, which > > doesn't match the code), the relevant section is > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#es-operations steps 1 through > > 3 in the third bullet point. > > > > It looks to me like per the current spec text that will throw a > > TypeError for the above call, unless the second argument to setItem > > is marked [optional]. > > Yeah I think that?s right. I?ll just note though that behaviour when > passing too many or too few arguments is still an open issue (although > it?s more likely that the ?too many? case will change than the ?too few? > case). > > OTOH, passing in undefined explicitly as the second argument would have > it converted to the string "undefined". Thanks for the clarification. I'll file a bug on WebKit. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090812/bff93889/attachment-0001.htm>
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 16:30:05 UTC