- From: 白石俊平 <shumpei.shiraishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:54:16 +0900
> I believe WebIDL says that a TypeError exception should be thrown, but it
> was not immediately obvious to me how to derive this from the spec.
Ok, I understood what behavior is correct (and that current webkit's
behavior is a bit wrong).
very thanks.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Ian Hickson<ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, ?~Y??~_???~J??? wrote:
>>
>> and, when passed value is undefined (e.g. `setItem("key")`), which
>> behavior will be correct?
>> On current implementation of browsers, I looked as follows.
>> - IE and Firefox raise error, (arguments number is incorrect)
>> - Webkit family persist it as string ("undefined")
>
> I believe WebIDL says that a TypeError exception should be thrown, but it
> was not immediately obvious to me how to derive this from the spec.
>
> ? http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
>
> --
> Ian Hickson ? ? ? ? ? ? ? U+1047E ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?)\._.,--....,'``. ? ?fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/ ? ? ? U+263A ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/, ? _.. \ ? _\ ?;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer. ? `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 01:54:16 UTC