- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:39:49 +0200
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:49:45 +0200, Elliotte Rusty Harold
<elharo at ibiblio.org> wrote:
> Section 1.7:
>
> "The first such concrete syntax is "HTML5". This is the format
> recommended for most authors. It is compatible with all legacy Web
> browsers."
>
> I challenge the claim that HTML5 is compatible with *all* legacy Web
> browsers.
I guess it depends on the definition of "compatible".
> I can produce valid HTML 4 documents today that are not
> compatible with *all* legacy Web browsers.
That's irrelevant. Can you produce valid HTML5 documents today that are
not compatible with all legacy Web browsers?
I guess the following is an example of a valid HTML5 document that is
incompatible with legacy Web browsers:
<!doctype html>
<title></title>
<svg><script/></svg>
<p>Hello world</p>
> I suggest this be weakened
> to something like "is compatible with most Web browsers still in
> active use today".
What is it that is not compatible with which browser?
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Friday, 7 August 2009 03:39:49 UTC