- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:22:13 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Drew Wilson wrote: > > I noticed that Section 4.6 of the Web Workers spec still refers to the > "close event" which has been removed: > > If the script gets aborted by the "kill a > worker<#122aa363b1e6e893_kill-a-worker>" > algorithm, then that same algorithm will cause there to only be a singletask in > the event loop at the next step, namely the task for the close event. > The "terminate > a worker <#122aa363b1e6e893_terminate-a-worker>" algorithm removes all the > events. > > Seems like we should update this language. Good catch, thanks. I removed the paragraph. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 03:22:13 UTC