- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:09:13 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: > > It seems pretty clear that there isn't anything else to refer to > for the date/time parsing rules -- but to me at least, specifying > those rules seems orthogonal to specifying the date/time syntax, > and I would think the syntax could just be defined by making > reference to the productions[1] in RFC 3339 (instead of completely > redefining them), while stating any exceptions. > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3339#section-5.6 > > I think the exceptions might just amount to: > > - the literal letters T and Z must be uppercase > > - a year must be four or more digits, and must be greater that zero I don't understand what that would gain us. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 25 April 2009 13:09:13 UTC